One of the other stupid points from the David Wallace-Wells article (the interactive portion) is they specifically call out and illustrate palm trees in London. But surely someone should have pointed out that if the AMOC--the gulf stream--slows down or stops because of meltwater from Greenland, then England will be significantly colder in a warming world. Why choose the one prediction that is very likely to be wrong?
One of the other stupid points from the David Wallace-Wells article (the interactive portion) is they specifically call out and illustrate palm trees in London. But surely someone should have pointed out that if the AMOC--the gulf stream--slows down or stops because of meltwater from Greenland, then England will be significantly colder in a warming world. Why choose the one prediction that is very likely to be wrong?